The NSW Agency League Table is an interactive dashboard that monitors the performance of state agencies and electricity supply authorities in responding to referrals made during the development application process.
It is updated monthly and tracks performance against referral timeframes.
Publishing the league table is part of a broader suite of transparency and accountability measures supporting the NSW Government's commitment to meeting the targets of the National Housing Accord.
The league table reflects performance across all referrals, not just those relating to housing.
From 1 July 2026, the Development Coordination Authority (DCA) will provide a single, coordinated response to referrals that might have previously gone to up to 22 different areas across the NSW Government. DCA’s performance will not be shown between July 2026 and January 2027. This transitional period allows time to build the data needed for accurate reporting.
Agency league table
The agency league table monitors the performance of agencies and electricity supply authorities against referral timeframes.
Agency performance data snapshot
Individual state agency performance
A snapshot of agency performance over a 6-month period for referrals is captured on the sixth business day of each month.
The NSW Government’s target is for at least 90% of referrals to be determined within required timeframes.
The agency league table shows the number of cases handled by each agency and the percentage completed on time over the previous 6 months.
| Agency name* | Number of cases | % of cases within legislated timeframe | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| AusGrid | 1,464 | 99% | |
| DCCEEW - CPHR (Heritage NSW) | 78 | 97% | |
| DCCEEW - CPHR (Regional Delivery)** | 11 | 100% | |
| DCCEEW - Water | 265 | 87% | |
| Department of Education | 5 | 80% | |
| DPHI - Planning | 6 | 100% | |
| DPIRD - Agriculture | |||
| DPIRD - Fisheries | 111 | 97% | |
| DPIRD - NSW Resources | 4 | 100% | |
| Endeavour Energy | 556 | 100% | |
| Environment Protection Authority | 43 | 100% | |
| Essential Energy | 1,301 | 97% | |
| Hunter Water Corporation | 14 | 86% | |
| National Parks and Wildlife Service | 4 | 50% | |
| Rural Fire Service | 1,623 | 76% | |
| Subsidence Advisory NSW | 87 | 99% | |
| Sydney Metro | 19 | 95% | |
| Sydney Trains | 102 | 99% | |
| Sydney Water Corporation | 526 | 92% | |
| TransGrid | 29 | 100% | |
| Transport for NSW | 485 | 91% | |
| WaterNSW | 211 | 98% |
|
Agency name* |
AusGrid |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
1,464 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
99% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DCCEEW - CPHR (Heritage NSW) |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
78 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
97% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DCCEEW - CPHR (Regional Delivery)** |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
11 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DCCEEW - Water |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
265 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
87% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Department of Education |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
5 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
80% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPHI - Planning |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
6 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPIRD - Agriculture |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
|
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
|
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPIRD - Fisheries |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
111 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
97% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPIRD - NSW Resources |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
4 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Endeavour Energy |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
556 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Environment Protection Authority |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
43 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Essential Energy |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
1,301 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
97% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Hunter Water Corporation |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
14 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
86% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
National Parks and Wildlife Service |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
4 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
50% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Rural Fire Service |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
1,623 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
76% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Subsidence Advisory NSW |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
87 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
99% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Sydney Metro |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
19 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
95% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Sydney Trains |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
102 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
99% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Sydney Water Corporation |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
526 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
92% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
TransGrid |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
29 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Transport for NSW |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
485 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
91% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
WaterNSW |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
211 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
98% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
*AusGrid, Endeavour Energy and TransGrid are privatised companies. **Formerly BCS.
Combined performance across all agencies
The following data represents the total number of cases for all state agencies for concurrence, integrated development and referrals (CIR), and the percentage of on-time completions.
| Month | 2025-26 Number of CIR | 2024-25 Number of CIR | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01-July | 1,317 | 1,104 | |
| 02-August | 1,227 | 1,179 | |
| 03-September | 1,081 | 995 | |
| 04-October | 1,232 | 1,212 | |
| 05-November | 1,173 | 1,233 | |
| 06-December | 1,051 | 1,092 | |
| 07-January | 819 | 911 | |
| 08-February | 990 | 1,045 | |
| 09-March | 1,056 | 1,051 | |
| 10-April | 978 | 942 | |
| 11-May | 1,339 | 1,160 | |
| 12-June | 1,249 | 1,028 |
|
Month |
01-July |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,317 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,104 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,190 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
96% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
96% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
93% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
02-August |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,227 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,179 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,189 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
95% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
95% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
03-September |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,081 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
995 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,000 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
95% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
91% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
04-October |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,232 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,212 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
938 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
95% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
91% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
89% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
05-November |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,173 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,233 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,101 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
94% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
97% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
87% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
06-December |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,051 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,092 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
899 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
94% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
95% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
81% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
07-January |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
819 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
911 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
695 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
85% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
89% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
79% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
08-February |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
990 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,045 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
821 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
95% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
71% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
09-March |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,056 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,051 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
883 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
94% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
96% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
87% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
10-April |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
978 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
942 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
923 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
95% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
84% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
11-May |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,339 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,160 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,114 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
94% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
94% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
83% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
Month |
12-June |
|---|---|
|
2025-26 Number of CIR |
1,249 |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,028 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
886 |
|
2025-26 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
93% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
86% |
|
Target |
90% |
Individual state agency performance
A snapshot of agency performance over a 6-month period for referrals is captured on the sixth business day of each month.
The NSW Government’s target is for at least 90% of referrals to be determined within required timeframes.
The agency league table shows the number of cases handled by each agency and the percentage completed on time over the previous 6 months.
| Agency name* | Number of cases | % of cases within legislated timeframe | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| AusGrid | 1,194 | 98% | |
| DCCEEW - CPHR (Heritage NSW) | 76 | 93% | |
| DCCEEW - CPHR (Regional Delivery)** | 11 | 100% | |
| DCCEEW - Water | 233 | 81% | |
| Department of Education | 10 | 90% | |
| DPHI - Planning | 10 | 80% | |
| DPIRD - Agriculture | |||
| DPIRD - Fisheries | 68 | 91% | |
| DPIRD - NSW Resources | 2 | 100% | |
| Endeavour Energy | 462 | 96% | |
| Environment Protection Authority | 42 | 81% | |
| Essential Energy | 923 | 97% | |
| Hunter Water Corporation | 16 | 56% | |
| National Parks and Wildlife Service | 10 | 70% | |
| Rural Fire Service | 1,487 | 78% | |
| Subsidence Advisory NSW | 93 | 97% | |
| Sydney Metro | 15 | 73% | |
| Sydney Trains | 102 | 92% | |
| Sydney Water Corporation | 408 | 90% | |
| TransGrid | 31 | 87% | |
| Transport for NSW | 411 | 88% | |
| WaterNSW | 157 | 91% |
|
Agency name* |
AusGrid |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
1,194 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
98% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DCCEEW - CPHR (Heritage NSW) |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
76 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
93% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DCCEEW - CPHR (Regional Delivery)** |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
11 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DCCEEW - Water |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
233 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
81% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Department of Education |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
10 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
90% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPHI - Planning |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
10 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
80% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPIRD - Agriculture |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
|
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
|
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPIRD - Fisheries |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
68 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
91% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
DPIRD - NSW Resources |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
2 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
100% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Endeavour Energy |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
462 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
96% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Environment Protection Authority |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
42 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
81% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Essential Energy |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
923 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
97% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Hunter Water Corporation |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
16 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
56% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
National Parks and Wildlife Service |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
10 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
70% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Rural Fire Service |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
1,487 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
78% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Subsidence Advisory NSW |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
93 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
97% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Sydney Metro |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
15 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
73% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Sydney Trains |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
102 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
92% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Sydney Water Corporation |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
408 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
90% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
TransGrid |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
31 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
87% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
Transport for NSW |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
411 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
88% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
|
Agency name* |
WaterNSW |
|---|---|
|
Number of cases |
157 |
|
% of cases within legislated timeframe |
91% |
|
Target (90%) |
90% |
*AusGrid, Endeavour Energy and TransGrid are privatised companies. **Formerly BCS.
Combined performance across all agencies
The following data represents the total number of cases for all state agencies for concurrence, integrated development and referrals (CIR), and the percentage of on-time completions.
| No. | Month | 2024-25 Number of CIR | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | July | 1,056 | |
| 2 | August | 1,120 | |
| 3 | September | 960 | |
| 4 | October | 1,150 | |
| 5 | November | 1,207 | |
| 6 | December | 1,084 | |
| 7 | January | 915 | |
| 8 | February | 1,047 | |
| 9 | March | 1,033 | |
| 10 | April | 939 | |
| 11 | May | 1,188 | |
| 12 | June | 1,091 |
|
No. |
1 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
July |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,056 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,190 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
90% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
93% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
2 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
August |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,120 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,189 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
90% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
3 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
September |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
960 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,000 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
87% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
91% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
4 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
October |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,150 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
938 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
84% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
89% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
5 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
November |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,207 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,101 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
94% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
87% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
6 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
December |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,084 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
899 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
81% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
7 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
January |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
915 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
695 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
86% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
79% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
8 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
February |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,047 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
821 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
71% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
9 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
March |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,033 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
883 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
90% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
87% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
10 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
April |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
939 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
923 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
89% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
84% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
11 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
May |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,188 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,114 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
91% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
83% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
12 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
June |
|
2024-25 Number of CIR |
1,091 |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
886 |
|
2024-25 Percentage of CIR |
89% |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
86% |
|
Target |
90% |
Combined performance across all agencies
This data shows the total number of referrals across all agencies, as well as the percentage completed on time.
| No. | Month | 2023-24 Number of CIR | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | July | 1,067 | |
| 2 | August | 1,282 | |
| 3 | September | 1,055 | |
| 4 | October | 882 | |
| 5 | November | 1,260 | |
| 6 | December | 1001 | |
| 7 | January | 958 | |
| 8 | February | 952 | |
| 9 | March | 1155 | |
| 10 | April | 990 | |
| 11 | May | 1,271 | |
| 12 | June | 894 |
|
No. |
1 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
July |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,067 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,067 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
77% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
77% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
2 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
August |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,282 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,282 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
78% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
78% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
3 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
September |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,055 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,055 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
75% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
75% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
4 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
October |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
882 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
883 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
75% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
75% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
5 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
November |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,260 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,260 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
82% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
82% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
6 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
December |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1001 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,001 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
81% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
81% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
7 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
January |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
958 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
960 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
78% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
78% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
8 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
February |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
952 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
955 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
81% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
81% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
9 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
March |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1155 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,159 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
88% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
88% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
10 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
April |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
990 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
991 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
90% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
90% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
11 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
May |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
1,271 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,272 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
92% |
|
Target |
90% |
|
No. |
12 |
|---|---|
|
Month |
June |
|
2023-24 Number of CIR |
894 |
|
2022-23 Number of CIR |
1,157 |
|
2023-24 Percentage of CIR |
86% |
|
2022-23 Percentage of CIR |
91% |
|
Target |
90% |
Frequently asked questions
The percentage of referrals that are completed within legislated timeframes over the previous 6 full months.
The total number of referrals completed for each agency in the previous 6 full months and the percentage that were completed within legislated timeframes.
Only agencies that have had a new referral in the past 2 years are shown.
The data shown in the agency league table is sourced from the NSW Planning Portal.
For development and modification applications lodged from 1 July 2026, the timeframe for responding to referrals is 28 calendar days from when the referral is made through the NSW Planning Portal and fees are paid.
For applications lodged before 1 July 2026, referral timeframes range between 21 and 40 calendar days.
Statutory referral requirements typically do not apply to SSD. While agencies are asked for their advice as part of the State significant development process, there are generally no statutory timeframes for providing this advice.
Measuring agency performance over a 6-month period provides a balanced snapshot that accounts for variations in development application volumes and complexity.