Case studies
Councils Development Assessment Guide
-
- A Metropolis of Three Cities
-
- Bankstown
- Bayside West Precincts
- Burwood, Strathfield and Homebush
- Camellia-Rosehill
- Carter Street
- Cherrybrook Precinct
- Church Street North
- Circular Quay Renewal
- Explorer Street, Eveleigh
- Frenchs Forest
- Greater Parramatta and Olympic Peninsula
- Greater Penrith to Eastern Creek
- Hornsby
- Independent Community Commissioner
- Ingleside
- Macquarie Park
- Narrabri
-
- North West Growth Area Implementation Plan
- Alex Avenue
- Box Hill and Box Hill Industrial
- Colebee
- Marsden Park Industrial
- Marsden Park North
- Marsden Park
- North Kellyville
- Riverstone East
- Riverstone Town Centre
- Riverstone West
- Riverstone
- Schofields Town Centre
- Schofields
- Shanes Park
- Tallawong Station
- Townson Road
- West Schofields
- Historical documents
- Northern Beaches Aboriginal Land
- Orchard Hills
- Parramatta CBD
- Penrith Lakes
- Pyrmont Peninsula
- Rhodes
- Riverwood
- Seven Hills
- South Eveleigh Train Workshop
- Telopea
-
- Aerotropolis Core, Badgerys Creek and Wianamatta-South Creek precincts
- Agribusiness precinct
- Luddenham Village Interim Strategy
- Master planning in the Aerotropolis
- Northern Gateway precinct
- The planning pathway
- Western Sydney Aerotropolis Development Control Plan
- Western Sydney Aerotropolis Explanation of Intended Effect
- Western Sydney Aerotropolis explained
- Westmead
- Wianamatta South Creek
-
- Technical assurance panel
- Urban Design for Regional NSW
-
-
- Artificial Intelligence in NSW Planning
- Assessment reports independent review
- Design guidance
- Environmental Impact Statement guidelines
- Environmental matters
- Faster Local Assessment Grant Program
- Geographic areas
- Sydney Planning Panels
-
- Advertising and signage
- Alpine resorts
- Building systems circulars
-
- Apartment Design Guide
- Better apartments
-
- Boarding houses and co‑living housing
- Build-to-rent housing
- Caravan parks, manufactured home estates and moveable dwellings
- Group homes
- In-fill affordable housing
- Retention of existing affordable housing
- Secondary dwellings
- Seniors housing
- Social and affordable housing
- Supportive accommodation and temporary housing
-
- Bayside Council’s housing snapshot
- Blacktown Council’s housing snapshot
- Blue Mountains Council’s housing snapshot
- Burwood Council’s housing snapshot
- Camden Council’s housing snapshot
- Campbelltown Council’s housing snapshot
- Canada Bay Council’s housing snapshot
- Canterbury-Bankstown Council’s housing snapshot
- Central Coast Council’s housing snapshot
- Cessnock Council’s housing snapshot
- Cumberland Council’s housing snapshot
- Fairfield Council’s housing snapshot
- Frequently asked questions
- Georges River Council’s housing snapshot
- Hawkesbury Council’s housing snapshot
- Hornsby Council’s housing snapshot
- How we developed the targets
- Hunters Hill Council’s housing snapshot
- Inner West Council’s housing snapshot
- Kiama Council’s housing snapshot
- Ku-ring-gai Council’s housing snapshot
- Lake Macquarie Council’s housing snapshot
- Lane Cove Council’s housing snapshot
- Liverpool Council’s housing snapshot
- Maitland Council’s housing snapshot
- Mosman Council’s housing snapshot
- Newcastle Council’s housing snapshot
- North Sydney Council’s housing snapshot
- Northern Beaches Council’s housing snapshot
- Parramatta Council’s housing snapshot
- Penrith Council’s housing snapshot
- Port Stephens Council’s housing snapshot
- Randwick Council’s housing snapshot
- Ryde Council’s housing snapshot
- Shellharbour Council’s housing snapshot
- Shoalhaven Council’s housing snapshot
- Strathfield Council’s housing snapshot
- Sutherland Council’s housing snapshot
- Sydney Council’s housing snapshot
- The Hills Council’s housing snapshot
- Waverley Council’s housing snapshot
- Willoughby Council’s housing snapshot
- Wollondilly Council’s housing snapshot
- Wollongong Council’s housing snapshot
- Woollahra Council’s housing snapshot
- Inland Code
- Social housing
-
-
-
-
- A sensory explosion
- Bowraville Children’s Playspace
- Civic Park Playspace, Warragamba
- Cook Reserve Playspace
- Livvi’s Place, Wagga Wagga
- Livvi’s Place, Warragamba
- Lot Stafford Playspace
- Masterplanned communities
- Melaleuca Village Lake Playspace
- Muston Park Playspace
- St Peters Fences Playspace
- Ten simple tips for more inclusive playspaces
- Town Beach Playspace
- Tumbalong Park Playspace
- Waitara Park Playspace
- Wild Play Garden
- Everyone Can Play grant
- Our principles
-
- Synthetic turf study
- NSW regional outdoor survey
- The Greater Sydney Outdoors Study
-
-
- Concurrence and referral reforms
- Employment land strategies
- Employment lands
- Employment zones reform
- Estimated development cost
- NSW Public Spaces Legacy Program
- Planning Reform Action Plan
- Planning pathways for cemeteries
- Priority Assessment Program
- State significant development warehouses and data centres
- News
Embedding a culture of continuous improvement
To reduce assessment wait times for development applications (DAs), the City of Canterbury Bankstown:
- made approval times a key performance indicator for council managers
- mapped the assessment process to help planners work more closely with other parts of the business (for example, with engineers and tree-management officers)
- provided additional training opportunities for staff, particularly in urban design
- gave individual planners personal responsibility for approving plans, backed by regular peer review and quality audits
- encouraged planners to communicate with the customer earlier in the assessment process so they can quickly act on any issues
- instituted monthly reporting of assessment times to improve performance
- introduced awards and recognition of individual and team achievements.
- The council’s development assessment team has improved relationships with customers, the community and other areas of the council.
- The knowledge of individual planners has improved, enhancing their professional judgement and decision-making.
- Tracking data and communicating results monthly has improved performance, reducing processing times.
- More consistent timeframes for processing assessments has made it easier to track and plan work.
- The customer receives time and support at the pre-lodgement stage to make sure the application is as complete as possible, and any potential issues are identified and flagged early.
Starting a free project-meeting service for developers
Blacktown City Council has introduced a free project-meeting service for developers delivering large projects in urban release areas to boost housing supply in the fast-growing region.
The previous pre-lodgement meeting process only catered for single development proposals and did not allow for a holistic consideration of longer-term projects requiring more than one development application (DA).
The key aspects of the new process are as follows:
- The nature and scale of a proposal will determine the frequency of meetings. At the initial meeting, a schedule for gatherings is agreed and tailored to the developer’s timeframe.
- At the meetings, the council’s key stakeholders are brought together with the developers to discuss potential issues and opportunities.
- The council’s Development Services Manager attends meetings to ensure that, where possible, decisions are made immediately.
- Specialists are brought in from both sides to resolve issues as they arise.
- The meetings result in faster solutions and ensure all parties leave with a better understanding of what stakeholders hope to achieve.
- Problems are resolved early, or strategies to resolve issues are mutually agreed at the start.
- Discussions are robust and productive.
Creating a team to explain the development application process – before the application is lodged
Blacktown City Council’s Gateway Team helps applicants understand planning controls and processes, and how to prepare a development application ((DA) by:
- providing guidelines for developments of all sizes
- identifying state environmental planning policies that may apply
- nominating service authorities that should be contacted
- highlighting potential issues with developments (for example, flooding, salinity or bushfire), and issues that must be investigated by a technical specialist
- identifying service authorities that should be consulted
- calculating section 7.11 Local Infrastructure contributions
- providing free pre-lodgement meetings with council specialists
- reviewing each DA on lodgement.
This approach frees up assessment officers so they can focus on processing DAs.
- The permissibility and feasibility of projects can be considered at the outset, before an applicant spends time and money preparing a development application (DA).
- Issues are identified and addressed early in the process, resulting in cost savings.
- Identifying and addressing all issues at pre-lodgement speeds up assessment .
- The quality of DAs has improved and determination times have been reduced.
- Assessment planners can now focus on assessments.
- As more research time is dedicated to general enquiries, the council provides more accurate and in-depth advice to the public.
- Staff turnover has fallen.
Fast-tracking low-risk applications using a digital platform
Liverpool City’s FastTrack digital platform makes it easier to lodge a development application (DA) and transfer documents, and quicker to conduct assessments. Turnaround times have been reduced to 3 to 10 days for low-risk DAs, and some are assessed in as little as 24 hours.
To implement the FastTrack system, the council:
- identified the assessment framework and planning controls necessary to deliver good outcomes, and developed new assessment processes more suitable for less complex developments
- began with a soft launch of the tool and framework to specific project -home builders before the formal launch to the wider community in mid-2016
- included performance monitoring of FastTrack as a key performance indicator in its Community Strategic Program.
While moving aspects of the development application (DA) process online streamlined lodgement and document transfers but reworking the approvals process led to substantial improvements.
- FastTrack is now available for a range of development types on around 44,000 properties across the city.
- Development consents and construction certificates are being issued within an average of 3 days, a 96% improvement compared to previous approval times.
- Council staff can focus on larger, more complex DAs and applicants can start construction sooner.
- User-friendly tools that identify permissibility and (limited) planning controls for new buildings enable dwelling approvals to be issued quickly with minimal impact on the local area.
- A digital interface facilitates clear advice and consistent messaging.
- Online lodgement ensures all necessary documentation is received before a DA progresses.
Note: Councils should ensure their assessment and notification requirements suit the risks associated with individual DAs.
Shaun Beckley, Project Coordinator – eBusiness and Planning Reform
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 02 9821 8805
Using checklists to identify non-complying projects before a development application is lodged
To improve development application (DA) assessment times, the City of Parramatta introduced lodgement and preliminary assessment practices that have improved the quality of applications.
The new system has sped up assessment times by:
- introducing checklists (for example, stormwater ) to be completed by the applicant’s engineer, to standardise and increase the quality of information submitted – this has also helped the council to cull non-complying schemes before lodgement
- checking DAs for engineering compliance immediately after lodgement
- implementing stricter deadlines for site inspections
- introducing targets to improve forecasting.
- Development application (DA) issues are typically identified within 10 days of an application.
- Engineering referrals typically meet the council’s 14-day target.
- The quality of engineering information with lodgement has improved and applicants understand it better.